Atul Waichal Vs Wadhwa Realty Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Authority finds that, the ITC, as a percentage of the turnover, that was available to the Respondent during the pre-GST period (April-2016 to June-2017) was 2.80%, whereas. during the post-GST period (July-2017 to September, 2019), it was 2.83%. This confirms that in the post-GST period, the […]
ITO Vs Tilak Proficient Nidhi Limited (ITAT Allahabad) The ld. CIT(A) simply accepted all the contentions /additional evidences filed by the assessee, without complying with Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, as it was incumbent on ld. CIT(A) to have forwarded all these additional evidences/explanations filed by assessee to the AO for its […]
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses Ambica Trust’s appeal as it failed to electronically file Form 10B for exemptions under sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.
In re Incnut Lifestyle Retail Private Limited (GST AAR Telangana) The applicant claims to be manufacturing Ayurvedic products under licenses issued by AYUSH Department of Government of Telangana. The applicant therefore is of the opinion that all the products manufactured by the applicant can be classified as Ayurvedic medicaments under chapter sub-heading ‘30049011’ @12% under […]
The applicant is printing leaflets and packing materials of his clients pertaining to pharmaceutical sector. The leaflet contains the literature pertaining to said medicine. Applicant wishes to know rate of tax including HSN code for printing of leaflets?
In re KPC Projects Limited (GST AAR Telangana) M/s. KPC Projects limited are executing works to Telangana State Tourism Development Corporation limited (Government entity) and desirous of ascertaining the rate of tax under CGST & SGST on their supplies. Questions raised: 1. In view of the services provided by the applicant to TSTDC, is the […]
AAR held that applicant is seeking an advance ruling on the liability of the third party, i.e., the developer who is not represented before this authority. A ruling cannot be given on the back of an effected party to determine his liability to pay tax. Hence the application is rejected.
Issue relating to the land vacation compensation charges claimed by the assessee in the year under consideration was duly examined by the Assessing Officer by making the necessary inquiries and after satisfying himself on perusal of the relevant details and documents placed on record by the assessee
DCIT Vs Kalyan Aqua & Marine Exports India Pvt Ltd (ITAT Visakhapatnam) We find that even though it is claimed by the Ld. AR that there was a technical error which prevented the assessee from filing/uploading the Form-10CCB along with return of income filed U/s. 139(1), the Ld. AR could not produce the Form-10CCB claimed […]
Term two years has been interpreted to mean that not during the whole period of two years, even if the land is used for some days in the earlier year, it would be sufficient for compliance of provisions of section 54B
