Notification No. 81/2022-Income Tax, Dated: 08.06.2022- Central Government notifies ‘Bihar Electricity Regulatory Commission’ constituted by State Government of Bihar in respect of the specified income under section 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES) New Delhi, the 8th July, 2022 Notification No. 81/2022-Income Tax S.O. 3142(E).—In […]
Notification issued by Commissioner of State Tax – Exempts the registered person whose aggregate turnover in the financial year 2021-22 is upto two crore rupees, from filing annual return for the said financial year Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai -600 005 Notification issued by Commissioner of State Tax, under T.N.G.S.T […]
Tulip Infratech Private Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Delhi) Ld. AO was of the view the assessee has paid EDC for the works carried out by HUDA and hence the same was liable for TDS u/s 194C Ld. AO also noticed that certain tax deductor sought clarification regarding applicability of TDS provisions on EDC charges […]
CESTAT Delhi ruling in Takata India Pvt. Ltd. case clarifies that a general provision for slow-moving inventory, not written off, does not attract Cenvat Credit Rules. Detailed analysis and implications.
Candidates can bring to the notice of the Examination Department, their observations, if any, on the question papers relating to Foundation Examinations being held in June 2022 by e-mail at examfeedback@icai.in or by way of a letter, sent by Speed Post, at the following address, so as to reach us latest by 5th July 2022.
Indian Redcross Society Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) We note that the Ld. Assessing Officer has not made any additions and nor even discussed the issue on the basis of which the reassessment proceedings were initiated. The assessee had pointed out that the Ld. Assessing Officer had committed a factual inaccuracy by stating that a sum […]
Provisions of Section 194C are not applicable on payments to agencies like HUDA on behalf of the State Government. The imposition of penalty under Section 271C was consequently found to be unsustainable in the absence of default of Section 194C of the Act.
Sunil M. Bhide Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Pune) It is seen from the penalty order that the assessee pleaded before the AO that he started construction of a commercial building on his plot. The construction work was halted because of paucity of funds. The said plot of land along with part construction was leased out […]
Uttam Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Assessee had filed its return of income under Section 139(1) on 13.09.2013. Thus, as per proviso to Section 143(2) of the Act, as it existed prior to its amendment by Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f. 01.06.2016, no notice under Section 143(2) of the Act shall be served on […]
EY Global Services Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT finds itself in agreement with the submissions made by the ld. DR for the Revenue. AO has only followed the ruling of AAR in assessee’s own case and as per the provisions of section 245S of the Act, ruling of Hon’ble AAR is binding upon the […]
