Mukesh D. Ramani Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) It is settled law that liability for duty of the company cannot be fastened upon the Directors of the company unless there is statutory provision to that effect. Since the BST Act did not contain any provision to the effect making the Directors liable for […]
The notice in Section 129(3) is provided for under FORM GST MOV-07 and the order is given in FORM GST MOV-09. The order in FORM GST MOV-09 raises a demand for penalty, and this demand is reflected as FORM GST DRC-07.
These regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Infrastructure Investment Trusts) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2022.
Badiger Raghavendra Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court) Petitioner, a ‘registered supplier’ under section 22 r/w section 26 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is grieving before the Writ Court as to non-consideration of his Revocation Applications dated 25.03.2021 & 26.04.2021 respectively at Annexures-F & G wherein he has […]
The applicant company and its officers, who have defaulted the provisions of section 203(1) r/w 203(4) of the Act for non-appointment of Whole- Time Company Secretary are liable for penalties under section 203(5) of the Act w.e.f. 07th February 2021 to till date, as the last CS has vacated the office on 07th August 2020. […]
A search and seizure action was initiated by the Income Tax Department on few business groups engaged in coal trading/ transportation, execution of civil contracts, extraction of iron ore and production of sponge iron, on 04.11.2022.
AO committed an error in summarily rejecting the appeal filed by the petitioner and also rejecting the request to condone the delay in filing the appeal without assigning proper, valid and cogent reasons and that the same deserves to be set aside.
PILMB shall submit a certificate confirming that all the Self-Certified Syndicate Banks (SCSBs) involved in Application Supported by Blocked Amount (ASBA) have unblocked ASBA accounts. The application for NOC shall be considered incomplete by SEBI if the application for NOC is not accompanied by a confirmation by PILMB that all the accounts in ASBA have been ‘unblocked’.
Podar Literacy & Education Trust Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) AO has disallowed the claim of depreciation as per the mandate of provisions of sec. 11(6) of the Act, which reads as under:- (6) In this section where any income is required to be applied or accumulated or set apart for application, then, for such purposes […]
Sh. Gurpreet Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh) ITAT held that where the lapse came about due to a mere technical error, like the one in the present case, i.e., inadvertent wrong filing of TDS Statement, i.e., in Form No. 26QB, rather than in the applicable Form No. 27Q, there is no case for levy of […]
