Case Law Details
Sh. Gurpreet Singh Vs ACIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
ITAT held that where the lapse came about due to a mere technical error, like the one in the present case, i.e., inadvertent wrong filing of TDS Statement, i.e., in Form No. 26QB, rather than in the applicable Form No. 27Q, there is no case for levy of late filing fee u/s 234E of the Act.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT CHANDIGARH
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 28.04.2022 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), [herein referred to as ‘CIT(A)’], for assessment year 2016-17, conforming the charging of late filing fee of Rs. 3,64,600/- u/s 234E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’) in respect of late filing of TDS statement in Form No. 27Q.
2. The following grounds have been raised by the assessee in this
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
