Roman Catholic Diocese of Eluru Vs ACIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Registered Society under the Societies Registration Act and is also registered u/s. 12A of the IT Act, 1961. The assessee is carrying out medical and educational activities and conducting pastoral activities in the name […]
PCIT Vs Moser Baer India Ltd. (Delhi High Court) A perusal of the aforesaid order of Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.4705/2014 makes it clear that the respondent company Moser Baer India Ltd. is not financially viable and is in liquidation before NCLT. The order also makes it clear that even if the Revenue were […]
DR Vidyottma Jha Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (Delhi High Court) In our view, it is not for this Court to direct payment of ex gratia compensation of Rs.1 Crore to all families whose members died due to Covid-19. The GNCTD has already formulated a uniform policy for the payment of ex […]
In re M/s Fermenta Biotech Ltd. (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that Light Feed Oil or Distilled Fatty Acid and Heavy Feed Oil or Fatty Substance Mixture merit classification under sub-headings 15042090 and 15161000, respectively, of the first schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. HFO, falling under sub-heading 15161000 is eligible for concessional rate of […]
88. Meetings of the Council. – The Council shall hold at least four Meetings in each Calendar Year with a maximum interval of one hundred and twenty days between any two consecutive Meetings at such time and place (including electronic mode) as the Council may determine.
MCA invites comments/suggestions on Report of Company Law Committee (2022) from all the stakeholders through e-Consultation Platform on the MCA website.
1. These regulations maybe called the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (Employees’ Service) (Amendment) Regulations, 2022. 2. These regulations shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
Concrete Additives and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs S N Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Mr. Menon’s contention that the tax invoices have been accepted by the respondent and therefore it is required to be presumed that there is an arbitration agreement between the parties also cannot be accepted. The acceptance of the tax […]
Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Vs Manglam Build Developers Ltd. (CESTAT Delhi) We find that the appeal is filed by the Revenue under the wrong assumption that the maintenance deposit taken by the respondent from the buyers is to be utilized for maintenance of the complexes and any unutilized amount will be transferred to the […]
J M Financial and Investment Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) HC held that since four years had expired from the end of the relevant assessment year, as provided under Section 151(1) of the Act, it is only the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner who could […]
