NCLT Ahmedabad approves Smeet Dineshkumar Chaudhari’s resolution plan for Salebhai Internet Limited, ensuring its revival with unanimous CoC support under IBC.
MCA has imposed a penalty on M/s Iyyanar Benefit Fund Nidhi Limited for violating Section 92(3) of Companies Act, 2013. Company failed to accurately disclose details of deposits and borrowings in their balance sheet, resulting in penalties being imposed.
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd after the Commissioner of GST and Central Excise dropped the proceedings initiated against the company.
The ITAT in Delhi has directed a re-adjudication in the case of Kishan Singh & Associates Vs ITO involving an addition made by AO under sections 69A and 115BBE of the Income Tax Act due to non-filing of ROI.
Analysis of the recent ITAT Pune decision in the Mayur Wines Vs NFAC case, highlighting the importance of correct procedures in claiming partnership remuneration deductions under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
During the scrutiny assessment proceedings, the AO made an estimated addition to the household drawings as the assessee did not provide a plausible reply to justify the expenses considering their family’s constitution and standard of living.
The case of M. Pandidurai Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise in CESTAT Chennai sheds light on the significance of upholding principles of natural justice in tax proceedings, setting a significant legal precedent.
Unravel the details of the CESTAT Mumbai case – Satyasai Human Resource Solutions Vs Commissioner of Service Tax. CESTAT grants refund on service tax advance paid in line with Rule 6 of Service Tax Rules.
Rajasthan High Court reassures petitioner’s right to a fair response in the case of Sodhani Sweets Pvt. Ltd. Vs Joint Commissioner, dismissing worries over the GST authorities’ consideration of the reply.
Calcutta High Court case between Saru Kankani and Union of India, focusing on the consequences of unjustified delays in filing legal actions.
