Board has also decided to simplify the norms for KYC’ verification in the light of introduction of Goods & Services Tax (GST) and in view of the emphasis of government on adoption of a unified identifier.
A. Manual on Performing Activities on Taxpayer’s Behalf 1. How can I as a GST Practitioner perform functions on a taxpayer’s behalf on the GST Portal? To perform functions on a taxpayer’s behalf as a GST Practitioner on the GST Portal, perform following steps: 1. As a GST Practitioner, login to the GST Portal with your […]
A. FAQs on Application for Extension of Registration Period for Casual / Non Resident Taxable Person Q.1 Can a taxpayer registered for a specified period, as a Casual Taxable Person or as a Non Resident Taxpayer, seek extension of the registration period? Ans: Yes, a Casual/Non Resident Taxpayer may apply to extend the registration period […]
In re ASL Industries Limited (GST AAR Jharkhand) Specially designed water tank assembly specifically made for Indian railways is falling under the HSN Code-8607 and the same has been specified in the entry no- 241 in notification no- 1/2017 dated 28.06.2017 of schedule I as notified u/s 5 (1) of the IGST Act (act no-13 […]
Office of Commissioner of Profession Tax, Maharashtra State, 8th Floor, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon, Mumbai – 400010. TRADE CIRCULAR No: ACST/VAT-3/PT/Late-fee-waiver/61/2017/B-2002, Trade Circular No. 57T of 2017 Mumbai, Dt : 30/12/2017 Sub: Exemption from payment of Late Fees U/s 6(3) of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act 1975 Ref: 1) Trade […]
If AO was not satisfied regarding transaction relating to the cash deposited by partner whose identity was not in doubt and assessee had furnished all the relevant documents, then addition could have been made in the hands of said partner and not in the hands of the assessee.
Many petty payments were made in cash and it was also not ascertainable whether payments attract disallowance under section 40A(3). Clearly, assessee could not establish genuineness of the expenses, therefore, AO was justified in computing income on estimate basis.
Development fee payment was not optional or voluntary on the part of the students but it was compulsory charge in the nature of fee for studying and continuing study in the institutions of the assessee, therefore, development fee received by assessee could not be classified as capital in nature for specific purpose or part of corpus fund of assessee trust. It was part of the current receipt and partook the character of other fee charged by assessee on account of tuition fee, term fee, etc.
A. FAQs on My Saved Application Q.1 What is a saved application? Ans: Any/All applications you have initiated and are in various stages of completion but have not yet been submitted are saved applications. These application will be available for updation and submission upto 15 days on the GST Portal. Example: New registration applications, Amendment […]
Overview of steps in the ITBA Assessment Module for passing assessment orders, including income computation, feedback, and order generation.
