Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Tribhuvandas G. Patel (supra) has held that any amount paid to the partner upon his retirement towards his share in assets is not a transfer within the meaning of section 47(ii) of the Act and not liable to capital gain.
Change of certain Examination Centre / minor correction in the address for November 2020 CA Exams. It is hereby informed that due to unavoidable circumstances, certain examination centre(s), as per details give below has been changed.
The appeal is disposed of, answering the questions of law in favour of the Revenue; but restraining the respondent-Revenue from recovering the amounts refunded since as of now the levy of service tax on the payment in lieu of foreign agency commission will not be leviable as ‘Business Auxiliary service’ prior to 18.04.2006. Parties are left to suffer their respective costs.
Principal Commissioner Vs Sudharshan 35 MM (NAA) Applicant No. 1 had filed an application dated 06.03.2019 under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Sudharshan 35 MM in respect of the supply of ‘Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where price of admission ticket is one hundred […]
Value of the goods declared in the GST invoice and the value in the corresponding shipping bill / bill of export should be examined and the lower of the two values should be sanctioned as refund. ‘Moreover, it has been specifically clarified in the Circular dated 15th March, 2018 that the clarification given in the, circular applies to exports made on or after 1st July 2017.
DCIT Vs B. E. Billimoria & Co. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) The material on record would show that the assessee being resident corporate assessee was assessed for the year under consideration u/s. 143(3) on 27/10/2017. During assessment proceedings, it transpired that the assessee sold an office premises vide agreement dated 31/03/2015 for a consideration of Rs. […]
ITO Vs Gautam B. Bafna (ITAT Mumbai) In the instant case, the corresponding sales made out of disputed purchases were not doubted by the Ld. AO before us. No contrary evidence to this effect was also produced by the Ld. DR before us. It is not in the dispute that the assesee had indeed made […]
C. Bright Vs District Collector & Ors. (Supreme Court) Whether the time limit of 30 days which is further extendable by a further period 30 days for a District Collector to secure the possession of a secured asset is mandatory or directory? The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the […]
Where regular assessment for the year under consideration remained unabated as on date of search, same could not be interfered with while framing section 153A assessment, in the absence of incriminating material discovered during search.
Santosh Kumar Subbai Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) In the instant case, the assessee has entered into development agreement for construction of duplex houses and assessee was to receive the constructed area of 5000 sq.ft by virtue of development agreement. However, after entering into agreement, the developer has vanished and no real development took place till […]
