In re Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers & Chemicals Ltd. Vs (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1. When landlord charges electricity or incidental charges in additional to rent as per Lease Agreement for immovable property rented to the tenant, is landlord liable to pay GST on electricity or incidental charges charged by it? Answer : The facts […]
In re Apar Industries ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Although there is an indirect reference to Entries No.250 and 252 of Schedule-I of the Notification No.01/2017-Integrated Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 in para-2 which states that “GST is applicable @5% for goods intended for Warship application vide Sls.250 and 252 of Schedule-I of Notification No.01/2017-Integrated Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017”, there […]
In re ENP Techno Engineers (GST AAR Gujarat) In view of the clarification given by the Board vide Circular No.126/45/2019 issued on 22.11.2019 as well as in light of the discussions made in the earlier paras, we conclude that the services of Electroplating surface coating and Electroless nickel plating provided by the applicant are classifiable […]
In re Girish Rathod (Jay Ambey) (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: Whether the product ‘Fusible Interlining Fabrics of Cotton’ is correctly classifiable under Chapter 52 or Chapter 59?” Answer: The product ‘Fusible Interlining Fabrics of Cotton’ of the applicant M/s Girish Rathod(Jay Ambey), Ahmedabad is correctly classifiable under Heading 5903 of Chapter 59 of the First […]
In re Liberty Translines (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority confirmed the Maharashtra Advance Ruling Autority Order by holding that the activities of the Appellant would not be classified as GTA service under the Head 996791 as there cannot be two GTAs in the single transportation of the goods. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF […]
In re Posiedon Hydro Infratech (GST AAR Gujarat) On going through the question on advance ruling sought by the applicant at (1) above, we find that the same is not related to the agreement made by them with M/S. WAPCOS or the agreement made between M/s. WAPCOS and M/s. SSNNL but is related to the […]
In re Shree Arbuda Transport (GST AAR Gujarat) Question-1: If we want to provide all above services for a ‘Single consolidated Rate’ as a package, whether such supply would be treated as ‘Mixed supply’ as per the provisions of Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017, since the services are not naturally bundled and are […]
In re Shivam Agro Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Whether the product ‘Zn EDTA’ (Zinc Ethylenediamine Tetra Acetic Acid) and ‘Fe EDTA’ (Iron Ethylenediamine Tetra Acetic Acid) Acetic Acid) being supplied by the applicant are classifiable under Chapter Heading 2833, 2921, 3105 or 3808 or any other Chapter Heading of the Customs Tariff Act, […]
In re J K Papad Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Under which Tariff Heading, the product dealt in by the applicant, i.e. PAPAD of different shapes and sizes are eligible to be classified? Answer: The product of different shape and sizes manufactured and supplied by applicant is “un-fried FRYUMS” and not “Papad” and is […]
In re J K Food Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Under which Tariff Heading, the product dealt in by the applicant, i.e. PAPAD of different shapes and sizes are eligible to be classified? Answer: The product of different shape and sizes manufactured and supplied by applicant is “un-fried FRYUMS” and not “Papad” and is […]
