Ashwini Sahakari Rugnalaya & Res. Centre Vs CCIT & Ors. (Supreme Court) The short question which arises for consideration is the claim of the appellant for benefit under Section 10 (23C) (via) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2002- 2003. The benefits in terms of the section are available […]
(a) notifies that the egg and egg products shall be subjected to quality control or inspection or both prior to export; (b) specifies that the type of quality control, inspection and monitoring shall be in accordance with the Export of Egg and Egg products (Quality, Control , Inspection and Monitoring) Rules, 2021 as the type of Quality Control, Inspection and Monitoring which shall be applied to such egg and egg products prior to export;
In re Harish Chand Modi (GST AAR Rajasthan) Q. (a) Whether reimbursement of electricity expenses, on actual basis, by the lessee to lessor would form part of taxable value? Ans:- Yes. In the instant case, reimbursement of electricity expenses, on by the lessee to lessor would form part of taxable value as it is not on actual […]
Final Findings in the Sunset review investigation concerning imports of ―Cold Rolled/cold reduced flat steel products of iron or Non-Alloy Steel, or other Alloy Steel of all width and thickness – not clad, plated or coated‖ originating in or exported from China PR, Japan, Korea RP and Ukraine.
For effective monitoring of imports of GM soya de-oiled cake by the Government of India and the directions received from Board in this regard, certain additional mandatory declarations are being sought from the importer in order to distinguish the GM soya de-oiled cake from other non-GM commodities or ones fit for human consumption.
RBI and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announce a project to link their respective fast payment systems viz. Unified Payments Interface (UPI) and PayNow. The linkage is targeted for operationalisation by July 2022.
SC issues notice in Apollo Tyres Ltd. Vs ACIT case, petitioner contests non-suiting by relying on contrary views of other High Courts.
Ashok Kumar Agrawal Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) It is submitted that on the date i.e. on 28.06.2021 when the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is issued, the power to issue the notice was preceded with a new provision of law and thereby Section 148 is to read with […]
JCIT Vs Reliance Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) We agree with the submissions of the Ld. Counsel for the assessee that since assessee has not earned any exempt income and therefore no disallowance is warranted u/s. 14A of the Act. In the case of Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT [372 ITR 694] the […]
Divi’s Laboratories Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad) It is submitted on behalf of appellant that appellant is an SEZ Unit. The chief contention of the Department for the part-rejection of the refund claim relates to service tax amount paid by the appellant on ocean freight services which is not included/covered under the […]
