Challenging the order dated 03/06/2014 of the CIT(A)-17,Mumbai,the Assessee has filed present appeal.Assessee-company,engaged in the business of manufacturing of textiles,filed its return of income on 30/09/2011 declaring total income at NIL.The Assessing Officer (AO) completed assessment u/s.143(3) of the Act,on 03/01/2014,determining total income at Rs.71. 52 lakhs.
ACIT Vs M/s. Lumax Automotive Systems Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The assessee-company explained that it has closed down its Aurangabad unit due to heavy losses suffered by the assessee-company. The assessee-company in this year has declared loss of Rs.4.34 crores in the return of income and after making addition as well, the net taxable loss have […]
Reference is invited to the Standing Order NO. 12/20 18 dated 25.04.20 18 and amendment made in Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 prescribing time limit for adjudication cases. In pursuance of the aforesaid amendment in the Customs Act and following the spirit of the proposed amendment viz. to expeditiously complete the adjudication process at the original stage, it has been decided to take up the adjudication cases on priority and complete them in time bound manner.
Bureau of Investigation constituted under section 8 of the said Act shall discharge its functions through the following Units, namely:– (a) Bureau of Investigation – Unit 1, in Kolkata, having different Zones as may be considered necessary by the Commissioner for discharging the functions under the said Act to investigate transactions of dealers or tax payers under Large Taxpayer Unit, Kolkata (South) Circle, Chowringhee Circle, Dharmatala Circle and Behala Circle;
Confiscation of freely importable air gun of 0.177 by shooter on the ground that he was not a renowned shooter is irregular as the same is not in conformity with rules prescribed for such imports.
Shri Ratan Babulal Lath Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Entire addition is on the basis of the statements of the assessee and Shri. Navneet Kumar Singhania recorded by the CBI. Before the AO, assessee has specifically denied such statements recorded by the CBI and has sought cross-examination of Shri. Navneet Kumar Singhania which were not afforded […]
Adhunik Infrastructure (P)Ltd. Vs JCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT held that even if an assessee is merely developing the infrastructural facility (without operating and maintaining the same), it is entitled to deduction u/s 80-1A. Further, condition (b) laid out in sub-section (4) of section 80-IA mandates the existence of an agreement with the Government. Moreover, if […]
This Appealunder Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 11th March, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 2009-10.
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee case was selected for scrutiny through CASS and notice u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as the Act) was issued and served upon the assessee requiring him to furnish necessary details and documents along with supporting evidence.
With effect from the 16th day of June, 2018 No e-Way Bill in respect of movement of goods originating and terminating within the State of Delhi (intra-State movement but without passing through any other State) shall be required where the consignment value does not exceed Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only).
