SBI Home Loans are cheaper effective from this May 1st. Cheer up! Now you can enjoy cheaper interest rate on SBI home loan. The RBI (Reserve Bank of India) reduced repo rate by 0.25% (repo rate is the interest charged by the RBI from commercial banks for lending money) for the financial year of 2019.
ITO Vs Globsyn Technologies Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) is the contention of the ld. AR is that no notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was served within the stipulated time prescribed in the Act and the reassessment order was without jurisdiction and prayed to dismiss the appeal filed by the revenue. Further he submitted that the […]
Gulab Badgujar (HUF) Vs CIT (Central) (ITAT Pune) The question which arises is the exercise of revisionary jurisdiction by the Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 of the Act against the order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, wherein the assessment proceedings were re-opened on specific reasons recorded for re-opening. We […]
NOTIFICATION No. 20 /2019-Customs (ADD) Seeks to impose anti-dumping duty on Saccharin, originating in or exported from Indonesia, in pursuance with anti-dumping investigation final findings issued by the DGTR. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) NOTIFICATION No. 20/2019-Customs (ADD) New Delhi, the 3rd May, 2019 G.S.R…. (E). – Whereas, in the matter of […]
M/s. Kolte Patil Developers Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) The issue in the present case is with respect to addition under the head ‘income from house property’ on the 32 unsold flats/shops by the assessee. It is an undisputed fact that assessee is in the business of Civil Engineers, Builders and Developers and had in […]
Temporary surrender of professional membership creates inconveniences where the IP is:(a) conducting a process – corporate insolvency resolution, corporate liquidation, individual insolvency resolution and individual bankruptcy – under the Code;(b) is acting as an authorised representative representing any class of financial creditors;
Second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) is retrospective in nature and in such circumstances, if payee has paid tax to government account then payer cannot be held liable for non-deduction of TDS.
ITAT held that As there was part non-compliance by assessee with first notice under section 142(1) and complete non-compliance with subsequent notice under section 142(1), the AO was right in framing assessment order under section 144 and in denying allowance of interest and salary paid to partners by taking support of provisions of section 184(5).
Where AO had issued the notice of penalty without specifying the grounds on which the same was imposed, imposition of penalty was unjustified, because this being a mandatory requirement could not be construed as a mere technical error.
Golden Gate Properties Ltd Vs DCIT (Karnataka High Court) Section 278AA makes it clear that in order to get over the penal consequences that follow on account of non-payment of tax deducted at source, it is open for the accused persons to come clean of the said charge by showing reasonable cause for failure to […]
