CIT (Exemptions) Vs Baroda Cricket Association (Gujarat High Court) 1. By this appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the appellant Revenue has challenged the order dated 11.06.2019 made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench ‘B’ in ITA No.2675/Ahd/2017 for assessment year 2014-15 by proposing the following three questions stated […]
INTRODUCTION ‘Benaml’ means ‘no name’ or ‘without name’. Benami properties are those that ore held by an owner through proxies. The property is purchased in the name of or held In the name of a person who has neither paid for it nor actually enjoys it it may even be held in the name of […]
Thank you Taxpayers … Your Income Tax is making it possible for more Indians to access quality healthcare. Pay your 4Th & final installment (100% of Advance Tax) for FY. 2019-20 by 15th March, 2020 Taxpayers liable to pay Advance Tax Any assesses, including salaried employee, whose tax liability for the financial year as reduced […]
As margin between the value as given by the assessee and the Departmental Valuer was less than 10 percent and the difference is liable to be ignored and the addition made by the lower authorities on this count cannot be sustained
Acuity Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Undisputedly, the subject premise in respect of which the assessee has claimed the rental expenses has been taken on lease by the assessee. Though, in the leave and license agreement, it is mentioned that it has been taken on lease for the use of residence of directors/employees, […]
Manipal Universal Learning Pvt. Limited Vs The Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore) Brief issues that require consideration in this case or as to Whether VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal) fee (both one-time fee for supply of goods and actual usage charges) charged for supply of VSAT equipment is liable for service tax under “franchise […]
Kalpaka Distrbutors Pvt Vs Union of India (Kerala High Court) On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I find that since it is not in dispute that the petitioner herein did attempt to upload the necessary details in the system maintained by the respondents, […]
In our view, these circumstance, if considered in conjunction with total absence of ill motive, mala fide intent or animus to cause wrongful gain to the importers and the petitioner, lead to a legitimate inference that the act on the part of the petitioner was the result of negligence and carelessness. It falls short of misconduct.
CESTAT Ahmedabad has held that Para 4.28(f) of Handbook of Procedure, 2004-09 relating to regularization of bonafide default by exporters using Advance Authorisations, cannot be applied straight away to normal imports where export obligations have been fulfilled.
Exchange Rate Notification No. 91/2019-Custom (NT) dated 19.12.2019-Notifying Customs Rate of Exchange of Foreign Currency Conversion w.e.f. 20th December, 2019.
