DCIT Vs Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) When the assessee had came forth with the full disclosure of all the particulars in respect of its aforesaid claim of expense, which as observed by us hereinabove had not been proved to be incorrect by the lower authorities, therefore, merely for the reason that […]
Notification No. 43/2020-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI); Dated: 10.09.2020- Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) (DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE) NOTIFICATION NO. 43/2020-CUSTOMS (N.T./CAA/DRI) New Delhi,the 10th September, 2020 S.O. 3125(E).—In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 453(E), dated 4th June 2015 in […]
Bangalore Club Vs CIT (Supreme Court) 1. In the year of grace 1868, a group of British officers banded together to start the Bangalore Club. In the year of grace 1899, one Lt. W.L.S. Churchill was put up on the Club’s list of defaulters, which numbered 17, for an amount of Rs.13/- being for an […]
The insolvency profession has a two-tier regulatory architecture with Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI or Board) as the principal regulator, and the three Insolvency Professional Agencies as frontline regulators.
Karmic Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We note that the assessee has issued shares at a premium. In order to ascertain the market value of the shares, the assessee adopted DCF method, as prescribed under Rule 11UA r.w.s 56(2) of the Act and accordingly, the shares were issued at a premium. According to […]
Based on the representations received from various stakeholders, it has been decided to put in place ‘Operating Guidelines for Portfolio Managers in IFSC’. The same is annexed herewith.
Metlife India Insurance Company Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore) CESTAT Bengaluru has held that Cenvat credit of service tax paid under reverse charge mechanism for availing services of insurance agents was available in a case when a portion of the premium amount (consideration towards output service), in case of ULIP policies, was […]
Shiroki Auto Components India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) CESTAT Ahmedabad has held that the child parts imported by the appellant are classifiable under Tariff Item 9401 90 00 as parts of vehicle seats as declared by the importer-assessee and not under Tariff Item 8708 99 00 as parts […]
ICAI decided that the students of May 2021 Final course, exam, can undergo MCS and Advanced IT Course through Virtual Mode can undergo the aforestated Courses through virtual mode to be conducted by the respective regional and branch offices of ICAI.
Ashokbhai Chinubhai Bharwad Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) The assessee has shown his share of sale consideration at Rs.81.00 lakhs being 25% share. The AO further found that sub-Registrar, Ahmedabad City Taluka had valued the property for the purpose of stamp duty payment at Rs.5,24,83,000/- as against sale consideration shown by the assessee at Rs.3,24,00,000/-. Therefore, […]
