Circular No. 62/62/94-CX As regards assessment based on invoice a Circular has already been issued from F.No.212/3/94-CX-6 (No.45/45/94-CX-6 dated 4.7.94) requestiong to furnish evaluation reports on assessment of RT-12 Returns for the month of April-May 1994 alongwith suggestions. Except from few Collectors, no such report has been received.
We understand that in the event of our failure to submit the above documents or withdrawal of Acknowledgement Card by SEBI, we shall forfeit the right of listing of the securities and shall be liable to refund the subscription money to the investors immediately.
Circular No. 61/61/94-CX I am directed to enclose certain targets set out by the Board in respect of above captioned subject (Annexure-I) for the year 1994-95 and to request you to send quarterly report on the subject in the enclosed proforma (Annexure-II) to the Board by the 5th of the month following every quarter of the year. Report for the 1st and 2nd quarter should be furnished by Ist week of October 1994.
Circular No. 59/59/94-CX I am directed to invite your kind attention to the instructions contained in Board”s Circular No. 1/93-CX.3 dated 17.3.1993 whereby classification of prickly heat powder manufactured under the brand names of “Nycil”, “Shower to Shower” and “Johnsons”
Circular No. 58/58/94-CX Kind attention is invited to the 69th Report of the Public Accounts Committee (1993-94) (10th Lok Sabha) dealing with action taken by the Government on the recommendations / observations of the Committee contained in their 44th Report (10th Lok Sabha) on “Union Excise Duties-Non-levy/Short levy of duty due to incorrect grant of exemption-Motor Vehicles.”
Circular No. 57/57/94-CX This corrigendum seeks to correct certain clerical mistake in Notification No.106/94-CE dated the 4th May, 1994.
Circular No. 56/56/94-CX I am directed to invite your attention to Board”s Circular No. 50/88-CX-8 dated 20.8.88 (F.No.267/31/88-CX-8) wherein it was clarified in consultation with Ministry of Law that if the raw materials are supplied by a principal manufacturer for the manufacture of any goods on job work basis, then the same would not be entitled for SSI exemption (unless principal manufacturer himself is entitled for SSI exemption) even if job worker is otherwise entitled for SSI exemption
Circular No. 55/55/94-CX I am directed to forward herewith copy of notification No.37/94-Central Excises (NT) dated 2nd September , 1994. This notification seeks to prescribe the specimen forms etc. to be used by units opting for compounded levy scheme on stainless steel pattis and pattas introduced vide notification No.22/94-Central Excises (NT) dated the 13th may, 1994.
he Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.M. SAHAI, J.- Is the State vicariously liable for negligence of its officers in discharge of their statutory duties, was answered in the negative by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh on the ratio laid down by this Court in Kasturi Lal Ralia Ram Jain v. State of U.P
Circular No. 54/54/94-CX I am directed to say that one of the points recommended by the Rekhi Committee is that while assessing the monthly RT-12 Return, The Superintendent of Central Excise should be bound to follow the approved classification list. The “inquiry” to be made by him as envisaged in Rule 1731 does not extend to a review of the approved classification list.
