Follow Us:

Ready Made Garments – Returned and cleared without duty – certain conditions changed – Notification No. 31/2011 dated 24.3.2011 amended

March 17, 2012 1074 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 8/2012-Central Excise Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 31/2011 -Central Excise, dated the 24th March, 2011, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 243 (E), dated the 24th March, 2011, namely:-

Cotton Goods 5% Excise duty enhanced to 6%. Notification No. 29/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 superseded

March 17, 2012 1261 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 7/2012-Central Excise In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), and in supersession of notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue No.29/2004-Central Excise, dated the 9th July, 2004, published in the Gazette of India Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R.420(E), dated the 9th July, 2004, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Government,

Excise Exemption to goods used for armed forces – raw material for bullet proof helmets added – Amends Notification No. 64.95-CE dated 16.03.1995

March 17, 2012 664 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 6/2012-Central Excise In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1of 1944) read with sub-section (3) of section 3 of the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 ( 58 of 1957) , the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 64/95-Central Excise, dated the 16th March, 1995, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 256 (E), dated the 16th March, 1995, namely:-

10% Excise duty made 12% and 5% made 10% in Notification No. 23/2003 – CE dated 31.03.2003

March 17, 2012 822 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 05/2012-Central Excise In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944), the Central Government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 23/2003- Central Excise, dated the 31st March, 2003, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (i), vide number G.S.R. 266 (E), dated the 31st March, 2003, namely

Govt to notify class of search cases where compulsory reopening of past six years not required

March 17, 2012 798 Views 0 comment Print

It is proposed that the provisions of section 153A and 153C may be amended so as to empower the Central Government to notify cases or class of cases in which the Assessing Officer shall not issue notice for initiation of proceedings for preceding 6 assessment years. However, action for completion of assessment proceedings for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in such class of cases in which search or requisition has been made would be taken. This would result in initiating assessment proceedings only for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which search or requisition has been made.

Processing of return not necessary where scrutiny notice issued

March 17, 2012 1345 Views 0 comment Print

Under the existing provisions, every return of income is to be processed under sub-section (1) of section 143 and refund, if any, due is to be issued to the taxpayer. Some returns of income are also selected for scrutiny which may lead to raising a demand for taxes although refunds may have been issued earlier at the time of processing.

Sum or property received by HUF from members not taxable

March 17, 2012 1261 Views 0 comment Print

Under the existing provisions of clause (vii) of sub-section (2) of section 56 any sum or property received by an individual or HUF for inadequate consideration or without consideration is deemed as income and is taxed under the head “Income from other sources”. However, in the case of an individual, receipts from relatives are excluded from the purview of this section and are therefore treated as not taxable. The definition of relative as given in this sub-clause is only in relation to an individual and not in relation to a HUF.

Fair market value shall be deemed full value of consideration if actual consideration not attributable or determinable

March 17, 2012 5686 Views 1 comment Print

Where in the case of a transfer, consideration for the transfer of a capital asset(s) is not attributable or determinable then for purpose of computing income chargeable to tax as gains, the fair market value of the asset shall be taken to be the full market value of consideration. Accordingly, it is proposed to insert a new provision (section 50D) in the Income-tax Act to provide that fair market value of the asset shall be deemed to be the full value of consideration if actual consideration is not attributable or determinable.

Capital gain on amalgamation – No need for issue of share by amalgamated company to amalgamating subsidiary company

March 17, 2012 4941 Views 0 comment Print

In a case where a subsidiary company amalgamates into the holding company, it is not possible to satisfy one of the conditions at (a) above, i.e. that the amalgamated company (the holding company) issues shares to the shareholders of the amalgamating company (subsidiary company), since the holding company is itself the shareholder of the subsidiary company and cannot issue shares to itself. Therefore, it is proposed to amend the provisions of section 47(vii) so as to exclude the requirement of issue of shares to the shareholder where such shareholder itself is the amalgamated company. However, the amalgamated company will continue to be required to issue shares to the other shareholders of the amalgamating company.

No requirement of issue of shares where resulting company itself is a shareholder of demerged company

March 17, 2012 7315 Views 1 comment Print

In case of a demerger, there is a requirement under section 2(19AA)(iv) that the resulting company has to issue its shares to the shareholders of the demerged company on a proportionate basis. However, it is not possible to satisfy this condition where the demerged company is a subsidiary company and the resulting company is the holding company.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031