Budget 2021- Seeks to amend notification No. 05/2019-Central Excise, dated 06.07.2019, to prescribe effective rate of Special Additional Excise Duty for Petrol and Diesel. Notification No. 02/2021-Central Excise Dated- 1st February, 2021. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) Notification No. 02/2021-Central Excise New Delhi, the 1st February, 2021 G.S.R.84(E). – In exercise […]
Budget 2021- Seeks to amend notification No. 38/2019 – Customs (ADD) dated 25th September, 2019 so as to temporarily revoke the operation of the said notification for the period from 2nd February, 2021 to 30th September, 2021. – Notification No. 06/2021-CUSTOMS (ADD) Dated 1st February, 2021. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) […]
Budget 2021- Seeks to amend notification No. 54/2018 – Customs (ADD) dated 18th October, 2018 so as to temporarily revoke the operation of the said notification for the period from 2nd February, 2021 to 30th September, 2021. Notification No. 05/2021-Customs (ADD) dated 1st February, 2021. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) Notification […]
For the purposes of sub-clause (i) and sub-clause (ii) of clause (85) of section 2 of the Act, paid up capital and turnover of the small company shall not exceed rupees two crores and rupees twenty crores respectively.
Honourable Speaker, the preparation of this Budget was undertaken in circumstances like never before. We knew of calamities that have affected a country or a region within a country, but what we have endured with COVID-19 through 2020 is sui generis.
Jaypee Powergrid Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is clear upon a perusal of the facts as found by the authorities below that the funds in the form of share capital were infused for the specific purpose of acquiring land and the development of infrastructure. Therefore, the interest earned on funds primarily brought for infusion […]
Mohammed Aslam Son of Abdul Rashid Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Under Section 15(I)(a)(iiia) of the Act of 1967, the smuggling of gold with intent to threaten or likely to threaten the economic security of the country is very much covered under the smuggling of “any other material” Thus, the contention of the […]
Universal Dyechem Private Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Once the show-cause notice is issued to the party concerned, the documents/records, which have not been relied upon, should be returned to the party. This is what even is suggested in the master circular dated 19.01.2017 which has been referred to in the representation. […]
Armed Forces Officers Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) A perusal of the assessee’s identical pleadings in all these six appeals fails to pin point any factual distinction qua the interest issue in these assessment years before us. We therefore adopt judicial consistency and partly confirm both the lower authorities’ action disallowing the […]
Dharti Quarry Works Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) We are of the view that there is no legal justification for withholding the amount referred to above, which is otherwise refundable to the writ applicants in passing of any assessment orders for the relevant assessment years. It could be said that such withholding of the refund is contrary […]
