Dilliraj Vs Deputy Director (Madras High Court) HC held that we are unable to persuade ourselves to agree with the Enforcement Directorate that the salaries and perquisites that were paid to Dilliraj (A.1) while he was in employment with FLCI would amount to proceeds of crime and any property purchased with that would stand tainted. […]
State Bank of India Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) A plain reading of the section 10(5) read with rule 2B does not indicate any requirement of taking the shortest route for travelling to “any place in India” or putting any kind of restrictions the route to be adopted for going to such a destination. Quite to […]
Yeshoda Electricals Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) This notice issued u/s. 148 is a manual notice and not a digital document. The digital document only does not require signature. A manual notice u/s. 148 is required to be dated and duly signed by the Officer who is issuing the same. A notice or an order without […]
Bhartiya Villa Salahkar Samiti (BVSS) has suggested Government to not to delete the provisions of GST Audit by audit professionals. Text of their Press Release is as follows:- Reg: suggestion not to delete the provisions of ‘GST Audit by audit professionals’ (CA/ CMA) BVSS applauds the efforts of the Hon’ble FM Mrs. Nimiala Sithamman & […]
In the backdrop of the global impact caused by the COVID pandemic, the much-anticipated Union Budget 2021 was presented in paperless form. The Finance Minister kept her promise of a ‘Budget like never before’ that was widely cheered for its focus on economic growth with key focus on infrastructure and healthcare.
Lam Research (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) It was submitted that Working capital adjustment is made for the time value of money lost when credit time is given to the customers. The Assessee however does not bear any risk and has no working capital contingencies. The Assessee has not incurred any expenses for […]
High Court held that even if the assessee is engaged in the category of activity of ‘object of general public utility’, they are entitled for registration under Section 12A. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the assessee can claim registration under Section 12A by categorising the activity of the assessee as ‘object of general public utility’.
Circular No. 03/2021-Customs F.No. DGEP/EOU/40/2017 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Directorate General of Export Promotion) ****** New Delhi, dated 03rd February, 2021 To, All Pr. Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Customs/ Customs (Prev.) All Pr. Chief Commissioners/ Chief Commissioners of Central Tax/ Central Excise […]
Absence of proof of demand for illegal gratification and mere possession or recovery of currency notes is not sufficient to constitute such offence. In the said judgments it is also held that even the presumption under Section 20 of the Act can be drawn only after demand for and acceptance of illegal gratification is proved.
P. Venkata Ramana Reddy Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) CBDT Circular mentions that the concerned assessees should be intimated that their cases fall either in ‘Limited Scrutiny’ or ‘Complete Scrutiny’ through notices issued u/s 143(2) of the Act and the procedure prescribed is that in Limited Scrutiny cases, the reasons/issues shall be forthwith (emphasis provided by […]
