Get all latest income tax news, act, article, notification, circulars, instructions, slab on Taxguru.in. Check out excel calculators budget 2017 ITR, black money, tax saving tips, deductions, tax audit on income tax.
Income Tax : Section 44ADA of Income Tax Act, 1961 offers a presumptive taxation scheme for professionals, simplifying tax compliance by allowi...
Income Tax : Compare tax on ₹12 lakh income in FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26. See new tax slabs, rebates, and savings introduced in Budget 2025 f...
Income Tax : Section 115BBE imposes a high tax rate on unexplained income to prevent tax evasion. Learn about tax rates, penalties, and complia...
Income Tax : Budget 2025 introduces new income tax amendments, including changes in tax slabs, TDS limits, and rebates under sections 115BAC an...
Income Tax : The faceless tax assessment scheme in India faces legal disputes over jurisdiction between JAO and FAO. Learn about key court ruli...
Income Tax : The Institute of Cost Accountants of India seeks inclusion of Cost Accountants in the definition of "Accountant" under Section 515...
Income Tax : Explore the Finance Bill 2025 highlights, including revised tax rates, TDS/TCS amendments, ULIP taxation, and updated rules for sa...
Income Tax : ICMAI addresses the non-inclusion of 'Cost Accountant' in the Income Tax Bill 2025. The Council is engaging with policymakers to e...
Income Tax : Lok Sabha issues corrigenda for the Income-tax Bill, 2025, correcting references, formatting, and legal citations. Read the key am...
Income Tax : KSCAA's representation to CBDT highlights challenges in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024, focusing on delayed appeals and suggesti...
Income Tax : M.M. Patel Charitable Trust Vs PCIT (Central) (ITAT Pune) In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune h...
Income Tax : ITAT, by going through established precedents, held that AO had not recorded any dissatisfaction with assessee’s voluntary disal...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi modifies the net profit addition after book rejection, limiting the increase to ₹1 lakh instead of ₹4 lakh for AY 2...
Income Tax : Delhi HC rules AO functus officio post-assessment, quashing reassessment notice against Vivo India for lack of due process and vio...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad ruled that mere suspicion cannot justify tax additions, deleting an Rs. 18 lakh addition in a property investment d...
Income Tax : Key updates on income tax deduction from salaries under Section 192 for FY 2024-25, including amendments, surcharge rates, and new...
Income Tax : CBDT extends the due date for filing Form 56F under Section 10AA(8) and 10A(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to March 31, 2025, for...
Income Tax : The Central Government notifies Punjab RERA for tax exemption under Section 10(46A) of the Income-tax Act, effective from the 2024...
Income Tax : The Indian government is set to introduce the new Income Tax Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on February 13, 2025. This comprehensive...
Income Tax : Bhaikaka University, Gujarat, is approved for scientific research under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, effective f...
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to offer any immediate relief to Vodafone, which has challenged the Bombay High Court order allowing the government to tax the company’s $11 billion deal with Hutch. The tax department had raised a demand for Rs 12,000 crore (Rs 120 billion) as tax on the 2007 deal. While refusing to stay the high court order, the apex court issued notices to the tax authorities directing them to decide within four weeks the liabilities of Vodafone.
When the first draft of the Direct Taxes Code (DTC) was released in August 2009, the provision dealing with Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) was one of the most discussed and deliberated provision. It proposed to levy tax on the gross value of assets. There were certain drawbacks and limitations which were pointed out to the government, as a result of which, the government decided to reinstate the earlier regime of levying MAT on book profits. However, after reading the proposed MAT provision in conjunction with the entire code, one is left wondering whether it will turn out to be a boon or a bane to taxpayers in India.
The Finance Ministry is believed to have agreed to modify its notification for exempting from tax the entire 9.5 per cent interest on provident fund deposits for 2010-11, and will soon announce the good news for EPFO’s six crore depositors.
# Booked: Challan / transfer voucher detail in the statement matches with corresponding details received from banks / PAO. # Match Pending: Corresponding challan details not received from the bank. # Match Failed (Challan): TAN and/or amount relating to a challan in the statement do not match with the corresponding details received from banks. # Match Failed (Transfer Voucher): Amount relating to a transfer voucher does not match with corresponding details received from PAO.
IDFC is coming out with the country’s first ever public issue of infrastructure bonds through which the lender expects to mop up Rs 3,400 crore. The issue would open on September 30 and closes on October 18. It is the first public issue of bonds by an infrastructure finance company under Sec 80CCF of the Income Tax Act that allows tax benefits for investment in long-term infrastructure bonds. The bond issue proceed would be utilised to finance the infrastructure projects in the country.
The advertisement reimbursement would definitely form a part of the operating profits of the assessee and would have to be taken into account for purposes of transfer pricing analysis.
Corrigendum No.5/2010 (F.No.142/13/2010-SO(TPL) “the above amendment has been made applicable with effect from 1st April, 2009 and will accordingly apply in respect of assessment year 2009- 10 and subsequent years.” the following lines shall be read; “the above amendment has been made applicable with effect from 1st October 2009
NC Notification No. 73/2010-Income Tax Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), hereby specifies the scheme or project “Navasari Cancer Care Foundation oncology wing”, is being carried out by Navasari Cancer Care Foundation, 5th Floor, Aditya Complex, Near Fuwara Telephone Exchange, Navasari-396 445, as an eligible project or scheme for a further period of three financial years commencing with 2010-11, i.e., 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13.
NC Notification No. 72/2010-Income Tax the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), hereby specifies the scheme or project “Tribal Schools and Welfare Initiatives at Jharkhand, Tripura and West Bengal”, is being carried out by Vyakti Vikas Kendra India, 19, 39th “A” Cross, 11th Main, IV “T” Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore-560 041, as an eligible project or scheme for a further period of three financial years commencing with 2010-11, i.e., 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13.
The assessee, a co-op bank, filed a return for AY 2001-02 showing a loss of Rs. 15.94 crores. As the return was belated, the assessee filed an application u/s 119(2)(b) with the CBDT requesting condonation of delay and for being allowed carry forward of loss. The principal ground on which condonation was sought was that there was a delay in appointment of the statutory auditor by the Registrar and a consequent delay in preparing the s. 44AB tax audit report. The CBDT rejected the application on the ground that the reasons were general in nature and there were no exceptional circumstances beyond the control of the assessee to file the return. It was also stated that the assessee was operating for several years and was aware of its obligation to get the accounts audited and to file the return within the due date. The assessee challenged the rejection of the application. HELD upholding the challenge: (i) The power to appoint statutory auditors is that of the Central Registrar and that was done on 3.9.2001. The Registrar appointed Chartered Accountants to be statutory auditors in place of the Departmental Auditors. This change was made in respect of all societies. Therefore, the assessee cannot be blamed for the delay in carrying out its audit as the same was beyond its control. The contention of the Revenue that the departmental auditors had started the audit in the year 2000 and it was for the assessee to get the audit expedited cannot be accepted. Though the departmental auditors might have started the audit, it appears that pursuant to the said policy decision that was taken, the departmental auditors were replaced by the Chartered Accountants to be the statutory auditors. Therefore, the reason given for delay deserves to be accepted; (ii) It is well settled that in matters of condonation of delay a highly pedantic approach should be eschewed and a justice oriented approach should be adopted and a party should not be made to suffer on account of technicalities.
