Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Narendrakumar Hansrajbhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Narendrakumar Hansrajbhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A)’s Relief Set Aside for Violation of Rule 46A – ITAT Ahmedabad Remands ₹10.64 Cr Bogus Purchase Case; Violation of Rule 46A Costs Assessee Relief – ITAT Restores ₹10.64 Cr Bogus Purchase Dispute to CIT(A); ITAT: Relief on Bogus Purchase Addition Invalid Without AO’s Remand Report Under Rule 46A; Procedural Lapse Under Rule 46A Vitiates Relief on ₹10.64 Cr Addition – ITAT Ahmedabad; ITAT Ahmedabad: Fresh Evidence Accepted Without AO Verification Violates Rule 46A; Rule 46A Non-Compliance Leads to Remand of ₹10...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031