Case Law Details
Case Name : Akhilesh Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Dehradun
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Akhilesh Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
Reassessment Quashed & Penalties Deleted – ITAT Dehradun Holds Notice u/s 148 Invalid for Wrong Email & Address
Assessee filed return declaring ₹22 lakh. AO reopened the case on 29.03.2021 u/s 147 & completed ex-parte assessment u/s 144 r.w.s 144B, adding ₹27.86 lakh as unexplained bank deposits u/s 69A. CIT(A) upheld the addition.
Before Tribunal, Assessee raised an additional legal ground that the notice u/s 148 was never served, as it was sent to an old postal address & wrong e-mail ID despite AO Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


