Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Akhilesh Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Akhilesh Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)

Reassessment Quashed & Penalties Deleted – ITAT Dehradun Holds Notice u/s 148 Invalid for Wrong Email & Address

Assessee filed return declaring ₹22 lakh. AO reopened the case on 29.03.2021 u/s 147 & completed ex-parte assessment u/s 144 r.w.s 144B, adding ₹27.86 lakh as unexplained bank deposits u/s 69A. CIT(A) upheld the addition.

Before Tribunal, Assessee raised an additional legal ground that the notice u/s 148 was never served, as it was sent to an old postal address & wrong e-mail ID despite AO

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728