This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 148 Notice Invalid for Wrong Email & Address: ITAT Dehradun
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Akhilesh Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Dehradun
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Akhilesh Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Dehradun)
Reassessment Quashed & Penalties Deleted – ITAT Dehradun Holds Notice u/s 148 Invalid for Wrong Email & Address
Assessee filed return declaring ₹22 lakh. AO reopened the case on 29.03.2021 u/s 147 & completed ex-parte assessment u/s 144 r.w.s 144B, adding ₹27.86 lakh as unexplained bank deposits u/s 69A. CIT(A) upheld the addition.
Before Tribunal, Assessee raised an additional legal ground that the notice u/s 148 was never served, as it was sent to an old postal address & wrong e-mail ID despite AO having the correct details from l...
Author Info
