Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subramaniam Swaminathan Iyer Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subramaniam Swaminathan Iyer Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur) ITAT Raipur held that addition under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act towards deemed dividend is vacated since loan is advanced in the preceding year. Therefore, in absence of any payment by the company in the current year, there is no justification to held that amount is received as deemed dividend. Facts-Vide the present appeal, the appellant has contested that CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of Rs.2,00,00,000/- made by the A.O, being the amount credited to capital a/c, treating it to be unexplained credit u/s.68. Further, it is al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930