Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiran Reddy Muddasa Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-2013
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kiran Reddy Muddasa Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed Merely for Two PANs; ITAT Remands Case for Verification of Cash Deposits & Deletes Consequential Penalty Assessee, engaged in catering business, regularly filed returns since AY 2009-10 under a new PAN (BFTPM6705H) after allegedly losing the old PAN (AQOPK2022J). AO issued notice u/s 148 on the old PAN based on cash deposits of ₹85.31 lakh in an HDFC Bank account linked to that PAN. As there was no response, AO passed an ex-parte reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 treating the deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930