Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiran Reddy Muddasa Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-2013
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kiran Reddy Muddasa Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed Merely for Two PANs; ITAT Remands Case for Verification of Cash Deposits & Deletes Consequential Penalty Assessee, engaged in catering business, regularly filed returns since AY 2009-10 under a new PAN (BFTPM6705H) after allegedly losing the old PAN (AQOPK2022J). AO issued notice u/s 148 on the old PAN based on cash deposits of ₹85.31 lakh in an HDFC Bank account linked to that PAN. As there was no response, AO passed an ex-parte reassessment order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 treating the deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A....
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930