Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alankit Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alankit Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) PF Delay- Checkmate- Check DATE- Due Date Depends on Salary Payment, Not Calendar Month Actual Salary Payment Date is the Key – Tribunal Unlocks Relief Under 36(1)(va) Alankit Limited filed its return of income for AY 2019-20. CPC, Bengaluru processed the return u/s 143(1) and made two major adjustments: Disallowance of ₹70,67,205 u/s 36(1)(va) (delay in deposit of employees’ PF/ESI contribution) Addition of deferred tax liability to book profit u/s 115JB, resulting in double addition (raised in grounds but not pressed before ITAT) Assessee challen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031