Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subbiah Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Subbiah Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

ITAT Chennai restricts addition on cash deposits – Treats assessee as commission agent, estimates income at 4% instead of taxing entire deposits

Assessee, an individual engaged in onion commission business, did not file return of income for AY 2012-13. Based on information of cash deposits of ₹1,00,31,039/- in ICICI Bank, AO issued notices u/s 148 & 142(1). As there was no compliance, AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 & completed it ex-parte u/s 144 r.w.s.147, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728