Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Govinda Rajulu Srinivasan (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Govinda Rajulu Srinivasan (ITAT Chennai)

Notice u/s 148 After 3 Years Needs Pr.CCIT Approval – ITAT Says Sanction by Pr.CIT Invalid, Reopening Quashed

Assessee ‘s case was reopened u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B by issuing notice u/s 148 dated 26.07.2022, resulting in addition of Rs.7 Crores u/s 68. Before CIT(A), Assessee challenged the validity of the notice itself, arguing that more than 3 years had elapsed from the end of AY 2017-18 & therefore approval of the higher authority i.e. Principal Chief Commissioner (Pr.CCIT) was mandatory u/s 151(ii). However, the notice

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728