Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pharmanza Herbal Pvt. Ltd Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pharmanza Herbal Pvt. Ltd Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) PCIT Was Right! AO’s “Allow First, Verify Never” Approach Invites 263- Form 3CL is Non-Negotiable – AO Can’t Grant 35(2AB) on Assumptions, 263 Sustained AO Allowed R&D Deduction Without Verifying Form 3CL – ITAT Confirms 263 as AO Ignored Mandatory Law! Assessee Company filed its return declaring income of ₹4.81 Cr. AO completed scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) accepting returned income. During assessment, AO allowed deduction of ₹1,80,11,055 u/s 35(2AB), being 150% of in-house R&D expenditure...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930