Case Law Details
Case Name : ITO Vs Shamsundar Kaliram Agarwal (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Shamsundar Kaliram Agarwal (ITAT Pune)
ITAT Pune: CIT(A) Cannot Remand 143(3)/144B Assessment – Must Decide on Merits- New 251(1) Proviso Not Applicable – Tribunal Quashes NFAC’s Remand to AO
Pune Tribunal considered whether CIT(A) was justified in remanding an assessment back to AO by invoking the new proviso to section 251(1) inserted by Finance Act 2024.
Assessee’s assessment was originally completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144B on 20.04.2021 at ₹50.80 crore against returned income of ₹2.93 lakh. CIT(A) by order dated 29.05.2023 had directed AO to recompute income based on peak ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


