Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prolific HR Consultants (India) Ltd. Vs ADIT (CPC) (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prolific HR Consultants (India) Ltd. Vs ADIT (CPC) (Karnataka High Court) Conclusion: Deduction under Section 36(1)(va) was allowable for a 16-day delay in depositing Employees’ Provident Fund by the assessee as delay was attributable due to the lockdown consequent upon the COVID-19 pandemic. Held: Assessee, filed its income tax return for AY 2021-22. It deposited the Employees’ Contribution to Provident Fund late on 01.06.2020, missing the 15.05.2020 deadline, and its deduction claim under Section 36(1)(va) was rejected. Employees’ Contribution to PF (due 15.05.2020) was deposited on 01...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031