Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prolific HR Consultants (India) Ltd. Vs ADIT (CPC) (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prolific HR Consultants (India) Ltd. Vs ADIT (CPC) (Karnataka High Court) Conclusion: Deduction under Section 36(1)(va) was allowable for a 16-day delay in depositing Employees’ Provident Fund by the assessee as delay was attributable due to the lockdown consequent upon the COVID-19 pandemic. Held: Assessee, filed its income tax return for AY 2021-22. It deposited the Employees’ Contribution to Provident Fund late on 01.06.2020, missing the 15.05.2020 deadline, and its deduction claim under Section 36(1)(va) was rejected. Employees’ Contribution to PF (due 15.05.2020) was deposited on 01...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031