Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amiya Shankar Ghar Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amiya Shankar Ghar Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata: Reopening Beyond Six Years Quashed – Escaped Income Less Than ₹50 Lakh; Notice u/s 148 Issued Without Jurisdiction, Reassessment Set Aside Background Assessee was a co-owner (1/9th share) in property sold for ₹1.46 Cr., his share being ₹16.27 lakh. AO reopened case u/s 147 by issuing notice u/s 148 on 27.07.2022. Assessee did not file return in response; AO proceeded with reassessment. Assessee argued reopening was illegal as it was beyond six years from end of AY 2014-15 and income allegedly escaping was far below ₹50 lakh thr...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930