This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Employee Cannot Be Taxed for Employer’s Funds – ITAT Remands 69A Addition
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramkumar Tallah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ramkumar Tallah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Employee Cannot Be Taxed for Employer’s Funds – ITAT Remands 69A Addition; 69A Addition Unsustainable Without Proper Verification – Tribunal Grants Relief
Bangalore ITAT dealt with addition of cash deposits in employee’s bank account. Assessee, an employee of M/s. Dreamz Infra India Ltd., was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) wherein AO treated cash deposits of ₹16.69 lakh in his bank account as unexplained money u/s 69A. CIT(A) confirmed the addition holding that the Assessee had failed to explain source of deposits.
Before Trib...




