Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Employee Cannot Be Taxed for Employer’s Funds – ITAT Remands 69A Addition

Case Law Details

Case Name
Ramkumar Tallah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement
Ramkumar Tallah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Employee Cannot Be Taxed for Employer’s Funds – ITAT Remands 69A Addition; 69A Addition Unsustainable Without Proper Verification – Tribunal Grants Relief Bangalore ITAT dealt with addition of cash deposits in employee’s bank account. Assessee, an employee of M/s. Dreamz Infra India Ltd., was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) wherein AO treated cash deposits of ₹16.69 lakh in his bank account as unexplained money u/s 69A. CIT(A) confirmed the addition holding that the Assessee had failed to explain source of deposits. Before Trib...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *