Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramkumar Tallah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramkumar Tallah Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Employee Cannot Be Taxed for Employer’s Funds – ITAT Remands 69A Addition; 69A Addition Unsustainable Without Proper Verification – Tribunal Grants Relief Bangalore ITAT dealt with addition of cash deposits in employee’s bank account. Assessee, an employee of M/s. Dreamz Infra India Ltd., was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) wherein AO treated cash deposits of ₹16.69 lakh in his bank account as unexplained money u/s 69A. CIT(A) confirmed the addition holding that the Assessee had failed to explain source of deposits. Before Trib...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930