This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Merely because an addition is made to the income declared by the assessee, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kanbay Sotware India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- ITAT Pune
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
RELEVANT PARAGRAPH
44. In Dharmendra Textile Processors’ case (supra), Their Lordships have held that that penalty under section 271(1)(c) provides remedy for loss of revenue. A penalty under section 271 (1)(c) involves payment of an additional amount, which is a civil liability to provide for remedy for loss of revenue, while a sentence of imprisonment under section 276 C means loss of individual liberty which does not help revenue in anyway except as serving as a deterrent for the potential defaulters. Therefore, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, a penalty un...



