Case Law Details
Case Name : Shashikant Damodar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shashikant Damodar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
AO duty-bound to refer valuation dispute to DVO u/s 50C(2)- Failure to seek DVO Report vitiates 50C addition- ITAT Remands Case to AO
In Shashikant Damodar Patil v. ITO, the Mumbai ITAT set aside a long-term capital gains addition made u/s, holding that AO was duty-bound to refer the matter to DVO when the assessee disputed the stamp duty valuation.
Assessee had sold inherited land for ₹50 lakh pursuant to an agreement to sell originally executed by his father in 1981 and modified in 1983. Due to prolonged litigation, the conveyance deed ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


