Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shashikant Damodar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Shashikant Damodar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

AO duty-bound to refer valuation dispute to DVO u/s 50C(2)- Failure to seek DVO Report vitiates 50C addition- ITAT Remands Case to AO

In Shashikant Damodar Patil v. ITO,  the Mumbai   ITAT set aside a long-term capital gains addition made u/s, holding that AO was duty-bound to refer the matter to  DVO when the assessee disputed the stamp duty valuation.

Assessee had sold inherited land for ₹50 lakh pursuant to an agreement to sell originally executed by his father

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728