Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hetal Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hetal Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) In the case of Hetal Ramanlal Shah vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Surat ruled in favour of the assessee by deleting a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose after the assessee filed a return declaring ₹1.49 lakhs of income for Assessment Year 2008–09, which was later assessed at ₹35.33 lakhs following disallowances of ₹33.73 lakhs under Sections 40A(3)(a) and 40A(3)(b). The disallowances were related to cash payments made for job work and purchases. Based on this assessment, the Assessin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031