Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hetal Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hetal Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) In the case of Hetal Ramanlal Shah vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Surat ruled in favour of the assessee by deleting a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose after the assessee filed a return declaring ₹1.49 lakhs of income for Assessment Year 2008–09, which was later assessed at ₹35.33 lakhs following disallowances of ₹33.73 lakhs under Sections 40A(3)(a) and 40A(3)(b). The disallowances were related to cash payments made for job work and purchases. Based on this assessment, the Assessin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031