This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 271(1)(c) Penalty cannot be levied on estimated income: ITAT Surat
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hetal Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2008-09
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Surat
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Hetal Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
In the case of Hetal Ramanlal Shah vs. ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Surat ruled in favour of the assessee by deleting a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose after the assessee filed a return declaring ₹1.49 lakhs of income for Assessment Year 2008–09, which was later assessed at ₹35.33 lakhs following disallowances of ₹33.73 lakhs under Sections 40A(3)(a) and 40A(3)(b). The disallowances were related to cash payments made for job work and purchases. Based on this assessm...






