This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Income Tax Addition cannot Be based Solely on unsubstantiated Loose Slips
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Ramachandra Setty & Sons (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14 to 2015-16, 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Ramachandra Setty & Sons (ITAT Bangalore)
In a significant ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Bangalore addressed the case of ITO vs. Ramachandra Setty & Sons, highlighting the necessity for solid evidence when making income tax additions. The tribunal underscored that additions cannot be based solely on unsubstantiated loose slips, stressing the importance of corroborative material evidence.
The assessee, Ramachandra Setty & Sons, argued that the statement made during the search action under Section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act held no evid...






