Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sudarshan Purushothama Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 277/Bang/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sudarshan Purushothama Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Sudarshan Purushothama, a partner in M/s. SRK OFFICE-X, filed his income tax return for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18, declaring an income of Rs. 5,17,030. His case was selected for scrutiny under the Cash Transaction Analysis System (CASS) due to cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) assessed his income as Rs. 18,56,029, adding Rs. 11,79,000 as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.

Purushothama appealed against the addition, claiming that the cash deposits were from earlier bank withdrawals and therefore explained. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dismissed his appeal, leading him to escalate the matter to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore.

Case Arguments

Assessee’s Arguments:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031