This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Section 69A Addition for Monies Recorded in Bank Statements: ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sudarshan Purushothama Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sudarshan Purushothama Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Sudarshan Purushothama, a partner in M/s. SRK OFFICE-X, filed his income tax return for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2017-18, declaring an income of Rs. 5,17,030. His case was selected for scrutiny under the Cash Transaction Analysis System (CASS) due to cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) assessed his income as Rs. 18,56,029, adding Rs. 11,79,000 as unexplained money under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act.
Purushothama appealed against the addition, claiming that the cash deposits were from earlier ban...
Author Info
