Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Section 56 addition When Assessee was not True Beneficiary but Only Facilitator

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2024 taxguru.in 2540
Case Name
Sai Samarpan Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2019-20
Advertisement

Sai Samarpan Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

The case of Sai Samarpan Realtors Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT revolves around the initiation of proceedings under section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and subsequent additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under section 56 of the Act. The appeals were filed against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] dated 28.08.2023.

The primary contention raised by the assessee in ITA No. 2710/Del/2023 was that the proceedings under section 153C should not have been initiated. They argued that the initiation lacked the necessary satisfaction recorded by the AO of the searched person, and the proceedings were conducted without providing the assessee with a copy of the recorded satisfaction. Furthermore, they contended that there was no evidence linking the seized materials to the assessee.

The second major issue concerned the addition of Rs. 25,00,000 and Rs. 19,00,000 under section 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO had made these additions based on payments received by the assessee, which were allegedly advances in respect of an immovable property transaction. The CIT(A) affirmed the AO’s order, prompting the assessee to file appeals before the Tribunal.

During the proceedings, it was revealed that the property in question was jointly owned by Mr. Narender Kapoor and Mr. Aseem Doomra, with the assessee company acting as a facilitator in the sale transaction. The Tribunal noted that the agreement to sell and purchase clearly indicated that the assessee was acting on behalf of Kapoor and Doomra. Additionally, it was found that the money received by the assessee from M/s Kritunairu Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. actually belonged to Kapoor and Doomra, not the assessee. The Tribunal also considered an affidavit submitted by the assessee stating that the received payment was handed over to Doomra.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 20,088

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.