Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Purni Devi & Anr Vs Babu Ram & Anr (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No……of 2024 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.17665 of 2018)
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Purni Devi & Anr Vs Babu Ram & Anr (Supreme Court of India)

The case of Purni Devi & Anr Vs Babu Ram & Anr, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of India, revolves around the interpretation of Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act. This provision deals with the exclusion of time spent in bona fide legal proceedings before a forum lacking jurisdiction. The court’s decision has significant implications for computing limitation periods in similar cases.

The factual history of the case dates back to 01.06.1984 when a suit for possession was filed. Despite obtaining a decree in their favor, the plaintiffs faced hurdles in executing the decree due to jurisdictional issues. The lower courts dismissed the execution application as time-barred, emphasizing the 3-year limitation period under Article 182 of the J&K Limitation Act. However, the Supreme Court delved into the applicability of Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act, which excludes time spent in bona fide proceedings before a forum lacking jurisdiction.

The court meticulously analyzed the provisions of Section 14(2) and its interpretation in previous judgments. It emphasized the need to interpret the provision in a manner that advances the cause of justice. Considering the circumstances of the case, including the genuine belief of the plaintiff in approaching the Tehsildar for execution, the court concluded that the time spent before the wrong forum should be excluded when computing limitation before the court having competent jurisdiction.

In its final verdict, the Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned orders of the lower courts. It restored the execution application to the Munsiff Court for fresh consideration, highlighting the importance of excluding the time spent before the wrong forum in computing limitation periods. The case underscores the significance of Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act in ensuring fairness and justice in legal proceedings.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031