Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : SIEL Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2659/DEL/2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2024
Related Assessment Year : 1997-98
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

SIEL Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that receipt of non-competition fee on account of restrictive covenants in respect of restrain on the source of income are capital receipts. Accordingly, the same is not liable to tax.

Facts- During the course of scrutiny assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee has received non-competition fee from Collaborator amounting to Rs. 64,42,20,000/-. AO formed a strong belief that prior to receipt of non-compete fee, the assessee had already transferred all assets of its compressor limited and, therefore, non-compete fees is not a consideration received for transfer of any asset as all assets were already transferred. Accordingly, it cannot be treated as capital receipts.

Conclusion- Held that compensation received for loss of agency is taxable as revenue receipt, however, receipts attributable to the negative covenants for not to carry on a business are capital receipts not liable to tax. Thus, the amount received as non-compete fee is not taxable and the Assessing Officer is directed to delete the same.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DEL-HI

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031