Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Rejection of refund application without granting opportunity of hearing is violative of principle of natural justice

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2023 taxguru.in 4997
Case Name
Shivbhola Filaments Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST & Anr. (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


Shivbhola Filaments Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST & Anr. (Delhi High Court)

Rejection of refund application without granting opportunity of hearing is violative of principle of natural justice

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in M/s Shivbhola Filaments Private Limited. v.  Assistant Commissioner of CGST [W.P.(C) 9742/2023 dated July 25, 2023] restored the refund application rejected by the Adjudicating Authority and held that the assessee would not be left unheard.

Facts:

M/S Shivbhola Filaments Private Limited (“the Petitioner”) is engaged in the manufacturing of Polypropylene Yarn and Polypropylene narrow woven fabric, which are subject to GST @ 12% @ 5%, respectively.

The Petitioner claimed that raw materials used for manufacturing the product (Granules, Master Batch, Spin Finish Oil) are chargeable to GST @ 18%  due to the inverted tax structure, the Petitioner was unable to avail the entire input tax credit paid by it on inputs.

In the aforesaid circumstance, the Petitioner filed refund applications for various tax periods from August, 2018 to March 2019. However, the Petitioner received the notice of rejection of application for refund (“the SCN”) in respect of each refund application filed by him.

The SCN rejected the refund on the ground of mismatch between the GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A.

In response, the Petitioner submitted reconciliation and for each tax period. However, the Revenue Department    rejected the refund application and challenged the same before the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”). The said appeals have been rejected by a common Order-in-Appeal dated November 18,2021 (“the Impugned Order”) without offering opportunity of being heard.

The Petitioner filed write before the Hon’ble Delhi High Court challenging the Impugned Order.

Issue:

Whether rejection of the refund applications solely on the basis of mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A was justified?

Held:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 9742/2023 held as under:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

Bimal Jain
Name: Bimal Jain
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 2,891

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.