Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kishor Digambar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kishor Digambar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that imposition of penalty under section 270A(9) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the limb within which the penalty is imposed is unsustainable. Failure of AO to quote any of the six sub-limbs as prescribed u/s 270A(9) makes imposition of penalty unsustainable Facts- The appellant assessee is a salaried employee had filed his original ITR u/s 139(1) of the Act declaring income of ₹8,82,790/- after claiming deduction u/c VI-A for sum of ₹1,65,284/-. Subsequently the assessee revised his ITR u/s 139(5) of the Act thereby slicing...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930