Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Denial of CENVAT to service receiver alleging issuance of invoice beyond prescribed period unjustified

Case Law Details

Case Name
Usha Martin Limited  Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Usha Martin Limited  Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that denial of CENVAT Credit to service receiver alleging that invoice is issued by service provider beyond prescribed period is unjustified as obligation of timely issuance of invoice is cast on the service provider and not service receiver. Facts- The service provider, M/s Maa Engineering, was not registered with the Department during the period 2005-06 to 2007-08. It provided certain taxable services such as erection, commissioning, crushing of iron ores to the Appellant. Invoices w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *