Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shanthi R. Pai Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shanthi R. Pai Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) AO made addition of Rs.26,79,000/- on account of cash deposits. Assesee stated that she is a home maker &  her husband  was employed overseas as Chartered Accountant serving overseas  from 1975 to 2008. He used to send money from abroad and also invested in Term Deposits in India in his name and her name. Regarding the cash deposits, assessee  stated that sources for the deposit might be interest free loans, which were given by her husband to his friends and relatives have been received back.  But the explanation was not supported by any evidence...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031