Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : US Technologies International Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal No. 7934 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/04/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2003-04
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

US Technologies International Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (Supreme Court of India)

BELATED REMITTANCE OF THE TDS AFTER DEDUCTING THE TDS WHETHER SUCH AN ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO PAY PENALTY U/S 271C

The Apex Court decision is on appeal against order passed by the High Court of Kerala confirming the levy of interest/penalty under Section 271C.

In this case, ITO had levied penal interest u/s 201(1A) for the belated remittance of the TDS. Addl CIT had levied penalty u/s 271C ( amount equal to TDS ) and the said penalty order came to be confirmed by the Kerala High Court.

At the very outset it is to be noted that this is a case of belated remittance of the TDS though deducted by the assessee and not a case of non deduction of TDS at all.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduadte from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Is Sumptuary Allowance to Judicial Officers Exempt from Income Tax? Law Doesn’t Mandate establishment of Nexus Between Interest-Free Funds & Exempt Income Investments by assessee Reassessment proceedings against struck off company invalid unless revived u/s 252 of Companies Act Payments to doctors by a hospital- Salary or Professional charges When freight charges were part and parcel of purchase of goods, TDS u/s 194C will not apply View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. cavkshetty says:

    One should not get carried away that since penalty itself is not leviable, prosecution can not be initiated. This is a case where the Act doesn’t provide for the penalty. Prosecution provsions DO APPPLY. In fact para 7.7 of the decision is emphatic.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031